|
1
|
- City Council Briefing
- September 7, 2005
|
|
2
|
- To update City Council and provide background information regarding the
proposed Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay
|
|
3
|
- Comprehensive Plan identified strong neighborhoods as a critical
component to the City of Dallas success
- Comprehensive Plan Workshop focused on tear-downs
- City Council appointed a Single Family Housing Standards Task Force to
explore a broad range of housing development issues
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Concerns vary by neighborhood
- Site management practices
- Environmental and drainage
- Escalating property values price some elderly and middle class families
out of neighborhoods
- Compatibility issues
- Height
- Setbacks
- Garages
- Paving
|
|
10
|
- Economic
- Reinvestment in older neighborhoods
- Increased property values
- Land Use
- Modernized housing options
- Redevelopment is an alternative to sprawl
- Lessens traffic congestion and commute times
|
|
11
|
- Distinctive neighborhoods
- Quality of life
- Desirable housing stock
- Encouraging quality infill and redevelopment
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Neighborhood prevailing standards:
Standards based on average or prevailing developed
conditions. Intended to function
as interim regulations while an overlay is developed by the
stakeholders.
- Neighborhood stabilization overlay:
Developed by the stakeholders to address concerns. Limited in scope, primary focus massing and location of the home.
|
|
14
|
- Petition
- Near-term neighborhood prevailing standards placed on area (Finite time
period)
- Development and adoption of neighborhood stabilization overlay
|
|
15
|
- New homes reflect built environment
- Compatibility within 500
- Items regulated:
- Stories
- Garage access, location and connection
- Front setbacks
- Corner side setback
- Interior setbacks
- Maximum paving within front and corner side yards
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Neighborhood crafts overlay in one-year period
- Use menu approach
- May have sub-districts (minimum size per sub-district is one block face)
- Overlay replaces prevailing neighborhood standards
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Immediate near term solution
- Allows development to continue
- Available to neighborhoods that want it
- Stakeholders establish their own standards
- Motivates work towards overlay
|
|
21
|
- Minimum area for an overlay
- Task Force 1 blockface
- ZOAC 3 acres
- CPC 50 homes
- Petition requirement
- Task Force 50% +1
- ZOAC 50% +1
- CPC 75%
- Timing
- Task Force 18 months
- ZOAC 1 year
- CPC 1 year
|
|
22
|
- Height & Stories
- Task Force Allow limitation
- ZOAC Allow limitation
- CPC Zoning prevails
- FAR
- Task Force Not included
- ZOAC Allow limitation
- CPC Not included
|
|
23
|
- Prevailing Standards
- Uncertainty
- Enforceability
- Time period
- Other CPC Amendments
- Require a final ballot
- Shift burden of proof of compatibility from permit applicant to City
during prevailing standards
|
|
24
|
- Finding a balance
- Beneficial and reasonable tool
- Simple and transparent process
|
|
25
|
|