|
1
|
- Proposed FY 05/06
- City Manager’s Performance Plan
- and its Integration with
- Strategic Planning
- October 19, 2005
|
|
2
|
- Describe the Current Use of the Performance Appraisal System.
- Recommend a Performance Plan for the City Manager for FY 05/06.
- Outline Current & Upcoming Efforts Related to Strategic Planning,
Staff Accountability, and Customer Service.
- Explain the Interrelationships Between These Planning Efforts.
|
|
3
|
- Current Use of the Performance Appraisal System
|
|
4
|
- The new performance appraisal system was implemented in FY04/05 from the
ACM level down.
- From November 2004 to February
2005, the performance appraisal and employee management training was
provided by Dick Grote to 1,000 managers and supervisors.
- Among the civilian staff 6,083 employees were evaluated. The Police and
Fire continue to maintained their existing performance appraisal system.
- The goal to achieve the “Bell Curve Result” was accomplished. It reveals
that the City does not have the “Everyone is Above Average Syndrome”.
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- In September 2005, the Human Resources Department surveyed employees,
with 1,324 responses.
- A clear majority of the survey participants responded favorably to the
Employee Performance Appraisal Process, including the appraisal form and
each phase of the process.
- The rating response ranged from 56% to 85% favorable regarding the Performance
Planning and Performance Review Phases of the process.
- Survey results suggest that more training and coaching are needed to
increase the number of supervisors conducting performance discussions
throughout the year and providing feedback or demonstrating ways to
improve employee performance.
|
|
7
|
- It is actually a family of similar forms that have slight variations
between the forms of the 4 employee classes to better reflect job
requirements:
- Managers & Supervisors, including Executives
- Professionals
- Administrative Staff
- Operations / Field personnel
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Integrate the Performance Appraisal Process with the City’s Strategic
Plan, Customer Service, Performance Measurement program and other such
processes and initiatives.
- Demonstrate Leadership By Example by expanding use of the appraisal form
to the City Manager.
- Adjust the employee competencies on the form to reflect the City’s
established values.
- Cascade initiatives and goals from City Manager’s plan down the ranks to
all civilian employees.
|
|
10
|
- City Manager’s Proposed
- FY 05/06 Performance Plan
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Current and Upcoming Efforts Related to Strategic Planning, Staff
Accountability, and Customer Service
|
|
22
|
- The Price of Government (POG) budgeting for outcomes and strategic
planning process will begin this fall. One of its work products will be
the development of the City’s Strategic Plan.
- The FY 04/05 Action Plan served as the Staff strategic plan, but the FY
05/06 Action Plan will be a bridge to the POG strategic plan. Thus its
focus will be on departmental tactical activities in FY 05/06. It aligns
major improvements to our regular operations and special projects with
KFA’s. Linked to Individual Performance Plans.
- The Comprehensive Land Use Plan currently being prepared serves as the
City’s strategy for addressing the natural and built environment of the
City. Management and planning for future developments, the City’s
thoroughfares and streets, and environment are included in this planning
effort. Linked with individual Performance Plans.
|
|
23
|
- 4. The Performance Measurements efforts
align every City service to a
Key Focus Area to develop quantifiable and measurable information.
Measures include:
- Inputs
- Outputs
- Efficiencies
- Effectiveness
- Community indicators
- These measures capture the
satisfaction levels of customer
service, unit cost of services provided, productivity levels, quality,
cycle time, etc. Linked to Individual Performance Plans.
- 5. The Customer Service Plan is
under development for Council consideration this winter. It outlines a
cultural change process to focus on quality customer service. Linked to
individual Performance Plans.
|
|
24
|
- Serves as the City’s interim Strategic Plan until the POG Strategic Plan
is developed for 06/07.
- Covers a 3-5 year planning timeframe, but its focus is on FY 05/06
activities.
- The FY in the title of the Action Plan refers only to the year in which
the plan was prepared, not the time period covered.
- Time Period Covered
- FY 04/05 Action Plan 04/05 – 06/07
- FY 05/06 Action Plan 05/06 – 07/08
|
|
25
|
- Initiatives: similar to the objectives in a traditional strategic plan.
It’s a group of planned activities that will support the planned Key
Focus Areas and their associated Priorities and Components
- Activities: specific actions or processes that will have a specific
purpose and will support the planned initiative to which they are
linked
- Long-term Target: The outcome of the activity or what the activity is
expected to accomplish toward the initiative it supports and the date
by which that target should be reached (it should be 3 to 5 years from
the current fiscal year)
- Planned FY 05/06 Annual Measures: the milestones or the quantifiable or
measurable projected progress toward the Long-term Target during the
fiscal year.
|
|
26
|
- The Action Plan contains only a subset of activities being performed as
part of City services.
- The Action Plan does not cover routine work performed under each
service.
- Includes initiatives and activities, such as
- On-going Activities and Projects from previous Action Plans
- New programs
- New special projects
- Legislative proposals
- New policy implementation
- New public-private partnerships
- Projects from executives’ annual performance plans
|
|
27
|
- Traditional Strategic Plan Action Plan
- Goals Key Focus Areas and
Components
- Objectives (Measurable) Initiatives and Long-Term Targets
-
(3 – 5 years in duration)
- Strategies Activities
- Tactics Steps
- Actions
- Cost Listed only if not already budgeted
- Performance Measures Annual Measures
- Time frame Time 3-5 years
|
|
28
|
- Contains a Sample from
- the Draft 05/06 Action Plan
- for Public Safety Key Focus Area
|
|
29
|
- The Interrelationships of Strategic Planning, Performance Appraisals,
and other Planning Efforts
|
|
30
|
- 2000 – Staff develops the 2000 Strategic Plan, presents it to Council
but no formal action is taken.
- January ’04 – Council develops the 5 Key Focus Areas and associated
components. The City Manager prepares his 03/04 performance plan.
- January ’05 – Council reconfirms the 5 KFA and makes minor adjustments
to the components.
- October ’05 – City Manager proposes her 05/06 performance plan mirroring
the plans used by all employees based on the 05/06 Action Plan.
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- Oct: Award the contract for Public Strategies Group to assist with POG
- Nov: Adjust as necessary and set the Manager’s 05/06 Performance Plan
- Nov: Bring completed 04/05 Action Plan and the proposed 05/06 Action
Plan to Council
- Jan: The POG process develops the new plan for 06/07 and beyond
|
|
38
|
- Sample of the Draft
- 05/06 Action Plan
|